Innovator Of The Century: Renaissance Man

It seems that everywhere I turn in the innovation blogosphere these days there is a constant point of view present among the pundits: innovation is impossible without a healthy cultivation of right-brain, creative thinking along with the more analytical left-brain thinking.  Daniel Pink and many others sound the alarm bells for a society, which increasingly stresses rote memorization and standardized tests over creative thought. The Harvard Review recently published an article celebrating the benefits to business of heterogeneous educational and cultural backgrounds and thinking. And I find these arguments both compelling and persuasive.

Daniel Pink claims that a critical economic shift is occurring, and it is a shift away from the traditional, logical, sequential-based economy that has served this country so well for so long, to an economy that combines these left-brained traits with creativity and empathy, and other elements of right-brained thinking.  And as I read more and more, I realize that everything old is new again; what Pink, and these other writers are describing is not a new concept, they are describing the “Renaissance man”.  Leonardo da Vinci was the archetypal Renaissance man, a scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, painter, musician, writer and more.  Thomas Jefferson included on his list of achievements horticulturist, political leader, architect, archaeologist, paleontologist, and inventor.  These men were the embodiment of innovation, combining both passionate creativity and extraordinary analytical capabilities, and they associated and synthesized knowledge in a manner that gets to the heart of innovation.

The concept of embracing all knowledge and developing all of our capacities in order to reach our full potential as people and as a society is not a new one, it’s merely one that, apparently, we have to rediscover.  The thesis put forward by Daniel Pink, and others, is that innovation results from the intersection of left-brain, linear, analytical skills and right-brain, big picture, artistic, empathetic skills. My position is that this notion, that innovation is born of eclectic reading and thinking, a diversity of interests, a patchwork of skills, and the ability to synthesize these skills and interests should not be as newsworthy as it is. The idea that in order to be innovative we must educate our children to be interesting, thoughtful, creative people is not new; it is as old as Aristotle and beyond.

So, perhaps one productive way to view the new age we are apparently entering into is to view it as our own Renaissance of sorts. As the first Renaissance witnessed a flowering of art and literature, and the emergence of a new view of education, equally this Renaissance will return to a greater prioritization of the arts and creativity in both education and business.  “Innovation”, “open innovation” and “crowd sourcing” are today’s hot topics, buzzwords that routinely light up the blogosphere and twitterverse.  Inevitably, they will be replaced tomorrow.  What will remain true, however, is that companies which view creative thought and empathy skills with equal criticality to those of technical skills, be it for recruitment or advancement, will be at the forefront in the coming century.  If innovation in all its many forms is part of what will help save us from the forces of outsourcing, automation, and commoditization, then what we need as businesses, as society, parents and individuals, is to ensure that creative and diverse thinking and learning are encouraged, recognized, and celebrated in every area of life.  And in the march ahead towards that worthwhile goal, we must learn from the great innovators of the past and reincarnate the educational and societal values which inspired their ideas and reduced their barriers to being innovative.


This entry was posted in Culture, Education, Society. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Innovator Of The Century: Renaissance Man

  1. Susan McCann says:

    I agree, creativity usually requires a little mathematics to be fully realized! Great article, Sarah, thank you.

  2. Gail Garvey says:

    The concept should NOT be as newsworthy as it is…but the current trend of test scores determining so much of school funding is working against what we need. If you have ever seen the TV series Connections with James Burke it is fascinating to see what idea or condition led on to which invention or trend “Life is a giant 3-dimensional globe made up of millions of threads that cross and recross each other”, says Burke as he traces the lines that lead from a French loom to IBM, from a kink in a water pipe to a carburetor. Also the book Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences has some good examples of why people should understand numbers – if the current economic crisis is not enough of a demonstartion.

  3. Todd Schmiedeke says:

    Well written and thought out. Thank you Sarah. I think often people believe they have to reinvent the wheel, when really if they just take time to breath / relax and acknowledge the great skills /experiences they already possess and make connections from what appear to be disparate thoughts, great ‘innovations’ could/would be realized.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s